Challenges of Digital Learning Experiences

Discussion: Challenges of Digital Learning Experiences

Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Challenges of Digital Learning Experiences
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Regardless of the environment, any learning experience brings challenges. Students in an online environment may worry about their technological skills or how they will interact with others. Students in a face-to-face course may feel anxious about the pace of material delivered live or how they will fit each class session into their schedule.

When thinking of digital experiences, educators not only have to consider the challenges students face but also address their own challenges including ethical considerations and best methods for delivering content. Not all methods that are appropriate in a traditional classroom can be used in an online setting. For example, consider a lesson where students are asked to gather vitals from a partner. How can this be accomplished online? A new strategy is needed.

In this Discussion, you reflect on how to address the challenges, ethics, and policies associated with digital learning.

To prepare:

Read the journal articles by Kenzig (2015) and Bristol (2019) in the Learning Resources.
By Day 3 of Week 9

Post an analysis of the challenges you foresee in delivering content in environments other than the classroom or face-to-face. What ethical issues and policies will you need to consider? Which modality (face-to-face or online) best suits your topic, learner groups, and characteristics, and why? Be specific and provide examples.

Use the Learning Resources and/or best available evidence from current literature to support your post.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

By Day 6 of Week 9

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by proposing a way to address a challenge they have identified. Explain how the challenge may lead to an innovative teaching practice.

Use the Learning Resources and/or best available evidence from current literature to support your responses.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 9 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 of Week 9 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 9

To Participate in this Discussion:

Week 9 Discussion

What’s Coming Up in W
Name: NURS_6331_Week9_Discussion_Rubric

Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting
45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the Discussion question(s) with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the Discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the Discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the Discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness
10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by Day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
N/A

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
N/A

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post main post by Day 3.

First Response
17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.

Second Response
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.

Participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

Still struggling to complete your homework?
Get instant homework help from our expert academic writers!