Discussion Peer Review

Questions answered in the peer review.

1. If the economy were close to high potential output, would policymakers present their policy prescriptions to increase real output any differently than if the economy were far from potential output? Why?
2. Have the poor benefited more or less from economic growth than the rich?

Your Task: Read the posting of your colleagues to further the discussion. Simply saying “I agree, great point, etc” is not a sufficient peer review. You must discuss your peer’s argument with detailed evidence (include citations). (minimum of 100 words)

• Please note! Friendly greetings and compliments are not included in the word count.
• Discussions and responses must show evidence of knowledge of facts pertaining to the issues being discussed and must attempt to apply the economic terms, ideas, and theories.