Marie Curie, chemistry and radioactivity-radiometric dating

1. The title of the report indicates the factors being manipulated, the effects or responses being measured and the specific topic under study.
2. Introduction – Background information is researched, in context with experiment and cited. Hypothesis is stated clearly and an explicit prediction is made that follows the hypothesis.
3. Materials and methods – Materials and amounts are identified. Steps are easy to follow and in paragraph form.
4. Data/Results – Data is complete and relevant. Tables are labeled, easy to read and units are provided. Graphs are labeled and axes are labeled appropriately. Results text adequately describes the results depicted in graphs and tables.
5. Conclusion – Results are related back to the hypothesis and prediction. The biological significance of the study is discussed. Any responses to questions in lab handouts are addressed.
6. Report quality – Report is well Organized, concise and cohesive. Contains no spelling or grammatical errors. Report seems polished.